PERBANDINGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS ANTARA SISWA YANG BELAJAR MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SEARCH, SOLVE, CREATE, AND SHARE (SSCS), NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT), DAN KONVENSIONAL DI SMPN 92 JAKARTA

WIDYA FAJAR MUSTIKA, . (2016) PERBANDINGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS ANTARA SISWA YANG BELAJAR MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SEARCH, SOLVE, CREATE, AND SHARE (SSCS), NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT), DAN KONVENSIONAL DI SMPN 92 JAKARTA. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

[img] Text
2. LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN PANITIA UJIAN SKRIPSI.pdf
Download (278kB)
[img] Text
3. LEMBAR PERSEMBAHAN.pdf
Download (42kB)
[img] Text
4. ABSTRACT.pdf
Download (250kB)
[img] Text
1. COVER.pdf
Download (20kB)
[img] Text
7. DAFTAR TABEL.pdf
Download (151kB)
[img] Text
4. ABSTRAK.pdf
Download (263kB)
[img] Text
6. DAFTAR ISI.pdf
Download (140kB)
[img] Text
5. KATA PENGANTAR.pdf
Download (160kB)
[img] Text
BAB I.pdf
Download (198kB)
[img] Text
8. DAFTAR GAMBAR.pdf
Download (137kB)
[img] Text
9. DAFTAR LAMPIRAN.pdf
Download (263kB)
[img] Text
BAB II.pdf
Download (325kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Download (331kB)
[img] Text
BAB V.pdf
Download (95kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (226kB)
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Download (480kB)

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis antara siswa yang belajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create, And Share (SSCS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), dan Konvensional. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 92 Jakarta pada kelas VII semester genap tahun pelajaran 2015/2016 pada pokok bahasan Jajargenjang dan Belah Ketupat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi experiment (eksperimen semu). Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik Two-Stage Random Sampling. Penelitian menggunakan hasil tes akhir (Post-test Only). Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah tes akhir kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis pada pokok bahasan Jajargenjang dan Belah Ketupat sebanyak 4 butir soal uraian. Intsrumen yang digunakan telah melalui uji validitas isi, konstruk dan empiris. Selain validitas juga dilakukan uji reliabilitas menggunakan rumus Alpha Cronbach. Berdasarkan perhitungan data hasil penelitian, kelas eksperimen I (model pembelajaran SSCS), kelas eksperimen II (model pembelajaran NHT), dan kelas kontrol (model pembelajaran konvensional) masing-masing berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal. Kemudian uji homogenitas menunjukkan bahwa ketiga kelas memiliki varians yang sama. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji kesamaan rata-rata dengan varians yang sama pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil perhitungan, diperoleh nilai 15,7688 dan Ftabel = 3,0845768 sehingga Fhitung > Ftabel maka tolak H0. Artinya terdapat perbedaan rata-rata hasil tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa kelas eksperimen I, rata-rata hasil tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa kelas eksperimen II, dan rata-rata hasil tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa kelas eksperimen III pada pokok bahasan jajargenjang dan belah ketupat. Sehingga dilakukan uji lanjutan kesamaan rata-rata dengan menggunakan uji Scheffe untuk mengetahui perbandingan rata-rata hasil tes kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis ketiga kelas eksperimen. The purpose of this research was to compare the critical thinking skills among students learning mathematical by using model Search, Solve, Create, And Share (SSCS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Conventional. This research was conducted at SMPN 92 Jakarta in class VII second semester of 2015/2016 academic year on the subject of parallelogram and rhombus. The method used is quasi experiment (quasi-experiment). Sampling using Two-Stage Random Sampling. Research using final test results (Post-test Only). The research instrument used was the ultimate test of mathematical ability of critical thinking on the subject of parallelogram and rhombus many as four items description. Intsrumen used has been through the test content validity, construct and empirical. Besides validity also performed the reliability test using Cronbach Alpha formula. Based on research data calculations, the experimental class I (SSCS learning model), the experimental class II (NHT learning models), and grade control (conventional learning model) each come from normally distributed population. Then the homogeneity test showed that the three classes have the same variance. Hypothesis testing is done by using the average equality test with the same variance at significance level α = 0,05. Calculations, the value of Fvalue = 15,7688 and Ftable = 3,0845768 thus reject H0. This means that there are differences in the average results of tests critical thinking ability of students 'mathematical experiment class I, the average results of tests the ability of solving mathematical student experiment class II, and the average results of tests critical thinking ability of students' mathematical experiment class III on the subject parallelogram and rhombus. So do advanced test average similarity using Scheffe test to compare the average of the results of tests of mathematical ability to think critically third experiment class.

Item Type: Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information: 1) Dra. Ratnaningsih, M.Si 2) Dr. Lukman El Hakim, M.Pd
Subjects: Sains > Matematika
Divisions: FMIPA > S1 Pendidikan Matematika
Depositing User: sawung yudo
Date Deposited: 20 Apr 2022 02:34
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2022 02:34
URI: http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/27170

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
repository is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.