PERBANDINGAN MODEL LATIHAN BLOCK DAN MODEL LATIHAN NON-LINEAR TERHADAP PENINGKATAN ANAEROBIC UPPERBODY PERFORMANCE PADA ATLET KLUB TINJU UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA

ALDIRA IBRAHIM, . (2023) PERBANDINGAN MODEL LATIHAN BLOCK DAN MODEL LATIHAN NON-LINEAR TERHADAP PENINGKATAN ANAEROBIC UPPERBODY PERFORMANCE PADA ATLET KLUB TINJU UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

[img] Text
COVER.pdf
Download (4MB)
[img] Text
BAB 1.pdf
Download (690kB)
[img] Text
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (835kB)
[img] Text
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (1MB)
[img] Text
BAB V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (450kB)
[img] Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Download (448kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (1MB)

Abstract

*ABSTRAK* Tujuan penelian ini adalah untuk mengatahui perbandingan Model Latihan Block dan Model Latihan Non-Linear Terhadap Peningkatan Anaerobic Upperbody Performance Atlet Klub Tinju Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Sasana Bima Sarinah Boxing Camp Jakarta Pusat. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode eksperimen, dengan jumlah sampel 10 orang atlet klub olahraga prestasi Tinju. Dari hasil analisis data yang telah didapatkan, diketahui bahwa hasil dari model latihan block dan model latihan non-linear untuk dimensi Jab &straight memiki thitung sebesar 0,438 dengan ttabel yang memiliki taraf signifikan 0,05 dan df (n-1) = 4 adalah sebesar 2,770. Maka thitung (0,438) < ttabel (2,770) yang berarti H0 diterima dan Ha ditolak, Model latihan block dan model latihan non-linear dalam dimensi hook memiliki thitung sebesar 1,292 dengan ttabel yang memiliki taraf signifikan 0,05 dan df (n-1) = 4 adalah sebesar 2,770. Maka thitung (1,292) < ttabel (2,770) yang berarti H0 diterima dan Ha ditolak, Model latihan non-linear dalam dimensi uppercut memiki thitung sebesar 0,635 dengan ttabel yang memiliki taraf signifikan 0,05 dan df (n-1) = 4 adalah sebesar 2,770. Maka thitung (0,635) < ttabel (2,770) yang berarti H0 diterima dan Ha ditolak, Model latihan block dan model latihan non-linear dalam dimensi pukulan kombinasi memiliki thitung sebesar 1,594 dengan ttabel yang memiliki taraf signifikan 0,05 dan df (n-1) = 4 adalah sebesar 2,770. Maka thitung (1,594) < ttabel (2,770) yang berarti H0 diterima dan Ha ditolak. Terdapat peningkatan dengan hasil rata-rata kenaikan presentase 2,2% untuk Model latihan block terhadap Anaerobic Upperbody Performanc, Terdapat peningkatan dengan hasil rata-rata kenaikan presentase 3,8% untuk Model latihan non-linear terhadap Anaerobic Upperbody Performance. Hasil menunjukan bahwa model latihan non-linear lebih baik untuk meningkatkan anaerobic upperbody performance dibandingkan model latihan block *ABSTRACT* The purpose of this study is to determine the comparison of Block Training Model and Non-Linear Training Model to Increase Anaerobic Upperbody Performance of Boxing Club Athletes of Universitas Negeri Jakarta. This research was conducted at Sasana Bima Sarinah Boxing Camp, Central Jakarta. The method used was an experimental method, with a sample of 10 athletes of the Boxing achievement sports club. From the results of data analysis that has been obtained, it is known that the results of the block training model and non-linear training model for the Jab &straight dimension have tcalculated at 0.438 with ttable that has a significant level of 0.05 and df (n-1) = 4 is 2.770. Then t count (0.438) < t table (2.770) which means H 0 is accepted and H a is rejected, Block training model and non-linear exercise model in hook dimension have tcount of 1.292 with ttable havinga significant level of0.05 and df (n-1) = 4 is 2.770. So t count (1.292) < t table (2.770) which means H 0 is accepted and H a is rejected, The non-linear exercise model in the uppercut dimension has tcount of 0.635 with ttable havinga significant level of 0.05 and df (n-1) = 4 is 2.770. Then t count (0.635) < t table (2.770) which means H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected, Block training model and non-linear training model in combination stroke dimension have tcount of 1.594 with ttable havinga significant level of 0.05 and df (n-1) = 4 is 2.770. Then tcount (1.594) < ttable (2.770) which means H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected. There was an increase with an average percentage increase of 2.2% for the block training model against Anaerobic Upperbody Performance, there was an increase with an average result of a percentage increase of 3.8% for the non-linear training model for Anaerobic Upperbody Performance. Results showed that non-linear exercise models were better at improving anaerobic upperbody performance than block training models. Keywords: Block Training Model, Non-Linear Training Model, Anaerobic Upperbody, Boxing

Item Type: Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information: 1) OKKI YONDA, M.Pd 2) Dr. RINA AMBAR DEWANTI, M.Pd
Subjects: Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga > Aneka Olah Raga > Atletik
Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga
Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga > Kepelatihan,Manajemen Kepelatihan
Divisions: FIO > Pendidikan Kepelatihan Olahraga
Depositing User: Users 18945 not found.
Date Deposited: 28 Aug 2023 04:33
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2023 04:33
URI: http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/39863

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
repository is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.