BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN PADA KASUS PEMBUNUHAN DITINJAU DARI PRAGMATIK SEARLE: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK

J. ANHAR RABI HAMSAH TIS'AH, . (2024) BERITA ACARA PEMERIKSAAN PADA KASUS PEMBUNUHAN DITINJAU DARI PRAGMATIK SEARLE: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. Doktor thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text 1. COVER.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text 2. BAB I.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (540kB) | Request a copy
	Text 3. BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (708kB) | Request a copy
	Text 4. BAB III.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (243kB) | Request a copy
	Text 5. BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text 6. BAB V.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text 7. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (477kB)
	Text 8. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (8MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Pada penelitian ini peneliti bertujuan untuk mensintesiskan suatu percakapan dalam proses peradilan dalam hal ini adalah penulisan berita acara pemeriksaan (BAP) kasus pembunuhan menggunakan teori tindak tutur Searle, teori linguistik forensik Coulthard dan Johnson dan teori linguistik forensik Correa. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus, yaitu mengangkat fakta, keadaan dan fenomena-fenomena yang terjadi serta menggunakan teknik analisis isi. Data bersumber dari data kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1 A Kota Mataram tahun 2020 yaitu data kasus pembunuhan, narkotika, penganiayaan, penghinaan, pencurian, dan UU ITE. Data dipilih secara purposif yaitu data kasus pembunuhan karena dalam berita acara pemeriksaan terlihat dengan jelas tuturan dari hakim dan terdakwa yang dapat dianalisis berdasarkan tindak tutur Searle dan linguistik forensik Coulthard dan Johnson. Hasil sintesis analisis dari Searle yaitu ditemukan bentuk tindak tutur asertif berjumlah 17 tuturan, tindak tutur direktif berjumlah 3 tuturan, tindak tutur ekspresif berjumlah 0 tuturan, dan tindak tutur deklaratif berjumlah 0 tuturan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis di atas, pada bagian asertif ditemukan tuturan yang mengindikasikan tindak pidana yaitu berupa tindak tutur boasting (membual) sebanyak 5 tuturan yang terdapat pada percakapan BAP Nomor 2, 10, 15, 21 dan 22 sehingga tuturan tersebut dianggap melanggar peraturan undang-undang yaitu menyampaikan keterangan palsu kepada hakim. Informasi palsu ini juga telah diatur berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana, berita bohong (hoax) diatur dalam Pasal 14 dan 15 yaitu penyiaran berita/pemberitahuan bohong yang dapat menimbulkan keonaran di masyarakat. Ancaman pidana bagi saksi yang memberikan keterangan palsu juga diatur dalam Pasal 242 KUHP khususnya ayat (1) dan (2) tentang memberi keterangan di atas sumpah atau yang biasa disebut delik sumpah palsu / keterangan palsu. Maka jika seseorang yang dengan sengaja dan dengan niat memberikan informasi palsu berarti telah melanggar Pasal 14 dan 15 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana dan Pasal 242 KUHP ayat (1) dan (2) tentang memberi keterangan di atas sumpah atau yang biasa disebut delik sumpah palsu / keterangan palsu. Hasil di atas juga bersesuaian dengan hasil sintesis dari teori Coulthard & Johnson dan teori Correa yang ada di penelitian ini. Kata Kunci: Tindak Tutur Ilokusi, Linguistik Forensik, Bahasa Sebagai Alat Bukti. In this study, the researcher aims to synthesize a conversation in the judicial process, in this case the writing of an investigation report (BAP) on a murder case, using Searle's speech act theory, Coulthard and Johnson's forensic linguistic theory, and Correa's forensic linguistic theory. The research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, namely highlighting facts, circumstances, and phenomena that occur and using content analysis techniques. The data comes from case data at the Mataram City Class 1A District Court in 2020, namely data on cases of murder, narcotics, abuse, insults, theft, and the ITE Law. The data was chosen purposefully, namely murder case data, because in the examination report, the speech of the judge and the defendant was clearly visible, which could be analyzed based on Searle's speech acts and Coulthard and Johnson's forensic linguistics. The results of the synthesis analysis from Searle were found to be 17 utterances of assertive speech acts, 3 directive speech acts, 0 expressive speech acts, and 0 declarative speech acts. Based on the results of the analysis above, in the assertive section, speech was found to indicate a criminal act, namely in the form of boasting speech acts, with as many as five utterances contained in the police investigation report conversations Numbers 2, 10, 15, 21, and 22, so that these speeches were considered to violate statutory regulations. namely, conveying false information to the judge. This false information has also been regulated based on Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations. Fake news (hoaxes) is regulated in Articles 14 and 15, namely the broadcasting of false news or notifications that can cause trouble in society. The criminal threat for witnesses who give false statements is also regulated in Article 242 of the Criminal Code, especially paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning giving statements on oath, or what is usually called the offense of perjury or false statements. So if someone deliberately and with the intention of providing false information means they have violated Articles 14 and 15 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Regulations and Article 242 of the Criminal Code paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning giving information on oath, or what is usually called the offense of perjury or false statements, The results above are also in accordance with the results of the synthesis of Coulthard & Johnson's theory and Correa's theory in this research. Keywords: illocutionary speech acts, forensic linguistics, language as evidence.

Item Type:	Thesis (Doktor)
Additional Information:	1). Dr. Romdani, M.Pd 2). Prof. Dr. Zainal Rafli, M.Pd
Subjects:	Bahasa dan Kesusastraan > Linguistik Bahasa dan Kesusastraan > Bahasa Indonesia
Divisions:	PASCASARJANA > S3 Linguistik Terapan
Depositing User:	Users 21471 not found.
Date Deposited:	05 Feb 2024 05:12
Last Modified:	05 Feb 2024 05:12
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/44442

Actions (login required)

View Item