Sofie Citra Rahmania, . (2025) ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER MATA PELAJARAN INSTALASI TENAGA LISTRIK KELAS XI SMK NEGERI DI JAKARTA. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.
![]() |
Text
COVER.pdf Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (226kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (323kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (265kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (709kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
Text
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (139kB) | Request a copy |
![]() |
Text
Daftar Pustaka.pdf Download (201kB) |
![]() |
Text
Lampiran dan Daftar Riwayat Hidup.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas soal buatan guru pada mata pelajaran Instalasi Tenaga Listrik kelas XI di SMK Negeri 5 dan SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta, ditinjau dari aspek validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda, dan efektivitas pengecoh menggunakan pendekatan Model Rasch. Penelitian ini juga menganalisis ketercapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran (TP) berdasarkan hasil pemetaan butir soal. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada April hingga Juli 2025 dengan pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian terdiri atas butir soal, kunci jawaban, serta lembar jawaban siswa kelas XI pada Ujian Akhir Semester Tahun Ajaran 2024/2025 di kedua sekolah. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan dokumentasi dan observasi, sedangkan analisis data dilakukan dengan bantuan perangkat lunak Ministep. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat validitas soal di SMKN 26 sebesar 76%, dan di SMKN 5 sebesar 80%. Nilai reliabilitas instrumen di SMKN 26 adalah 0,83 dan 0,78, sedangkan di SMKN 5 sebesar 0,86 dan 0,72. Tingkat kesukaran soal di SMKN 26 didominasi kategori sedang (36%), sedangkan di SMKN 5 sebesar 44%. Daya pembeda di SMKN 26 sebagian besar berada pada kategori cukup (80%), sedangkan di SMKN 5 mayoritas pada kategori baik (88%). Efektivitas pengecoh di SMKN 26 menunjukkan bahwa 72% masih kurang atau tidak baik, sementara di SMKN 5 terdapat 20% pengecoh yang berfungsi dengan baik. Rekapitulasi menunjukkan bahwa di SMKN 26 terdapat 12% soal berkategori baik, 48% cukup baik namun perlu direvisi, dan 40% tidak baik. Di SMKN 5, terdapat 24% soal baik, 56% perlu direvisi, dan 20% tidak layak digunakan. Pemetaan TP menunjukkan bahwa 64% soal di SMKN 26 mendukung ketercapaian TP, sedangkan di SMKN 5 hanya 36%. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa ketercapaian TP tidak selalu sejalan dengan kualitas teknis soal. Soal yang baik dapat disimpan, yang cukup baik direvisi, dan yang tidak baik tidak disarankan untuk digunakan kembali.*****This study aims to evaluate the quality of teacher-developed test items in the Electrical Installation subject for Grade XI students at SMK Negeri 5 and SMK Negeri 26 Jakarta. The evaluation covers five key aspects: validity, Reliability, Item Difficulty, item discrimination, and distractor effectiveness, using the Rasch Model approach. Additionally, the study analyzes the achievement of Learning Objectives (TP) based on item mapping. The research was conducted from April to July 2025 using a descriptive quantitative approach. The sample included test items, answer keys, and student answer sheets from the Final Semester Examination for the 2024/2025 academic year at both schools. Data collection techniques involved documentation and observation, while data analysis was assisted by the Ministep software. The findings show that the validity level of test items in SMKN 26 was 76%, and in SMKN 5 was 80%. The Reliability values in SMKN 26 were 0.83 and 0.78, while in SMKN 5 they were 0.86 and 0.72. In terms of Item Difficulty, the majority of questions at SMKN 26 were in the moderate category (36%), while in SMKN 5 it was 44%. Item discrimination in SMKN 26 was mostly in the fair category (80%), while in SMKN 5 the majority fell into the good category (88%). Distractor effectiveness analysis showed that 72% of distractors in SMKN 26 were poor or ineffective, while 20% of distractors in SMKN 5 were effective. The overall item classification shows that in SMKN 26, 12% of the questions were considered good, 48% required revision, and 40% were poor. In SMKN 5, 24% of the items were categorized as good, 56% needed revision, and 20% were not recommended for reuse. The TP mapping results indicate that 64% of the items in SMKN 26 supported the achievement of learning objectives, while only 36% did so in SMKN 5. This indicates that the achievement of learning objectives does not always align with the technical quality of test items. Good items should be retained, fair ones revised, and poor ones are not recommended for future use.
Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 1). Prof. Dr. Soeprijanto, M.Pd. ; 2). Dr. Muksin, S.Pd., M.Pd. |
Subjects: | Pendidikan > Evaluasi Pendidikan Pendidikan > Teori, Penelitian Pendidikan Pendidikan > Penelitian Tindakan Kelas > Pendidikan Tinggi, Universitas |
Divisions: | FT > S1 Pendidikan Teknik Elektro |
Depositing User: | Sofie Citra Rahmania . |
Date Deposited: | 05 Aug 2025 02:24 |
Last Modified: | 05 Aug 2025 02:24 |
URI: | http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/57450 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |