ANALISIS PERBEDAAN KINERJA SMART BREAKER BERDASARKAN KONSUMSI DAYA, SUHU, DAN WAKTU RESPONS JARINGAN

AALIYAH RIHHADATUL 'AISY AZZAHRA, . (2025) ANALISIS PERBEDAAN KINERJA SMART BREAKER BERDASARKAN KONSUMSI DAYA, SUHU, DAN WAKTU RESPONS JARINGAN. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (745kB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (494kB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (861kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (979kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (341kB) | Request a copy
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (342kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan kinerja dari tiga sampel smart breaker yang populer di pasar Indonesia, dengan fokus pada tiga parameter teknis utama: konsumsi daya, suhu, dan waktu respons jaringan. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah meningkatnya tren smart home di Indonesia yang diiringi dengan kebingungan konsumen dalam memilih produk yang andal, di mana keputusan pembelian sering kali tidak didasarkan pada data kinerja objektif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah eksperimen kuantitatif, di mana tiga sampel smart breaker diuji menggunakan beban lampu LED 5, 7, dan 9 Watt untuk mengukur konsumsi daya, suhu operasional, serta waktu respons jaringan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya trade-off kinerja yang jelas antar merek. Sampel 1 mengonsumsi daya ~0,23 W, beroperasi pada suhu ~36°C dengan waktu ±225 detik untuk mencapai suhu tersebut, serta waktu respons jaringan yaitu 103-110 ms dan mencapai jarak yaitu 8 meter jika ada penghalang. Sampel 2 mengonsumsi daya ~0,55 W, beroperasi pada suhu ~30°C dengan waktu ±70 detik untuk mencapai suhu tersebut, serta waktu respons jaringan yaitu 311-331 ms dan mencapai jarak yaitu 4 meter jika ada penghalang. Sampel 3 mengonsumsi daya ~0,33 W, beroperasi pada suhu ~34°C dengan waktu ±200 detik untuk mencapai suhu tersebut, serta waktu respons jaringan yaitu 177-189 ms dan mencapai jarak yaitu 7 meter jika ada penghalang.. Kesimpulannya, tidak ada satu merek pun yang unggul secara absolut. Pilihan smart breaker yang ideal bergantung pada prioritas pengguna; untuk konsumsi daya terendah dimiliki sampel 1, diikuti sampel 3, dan sampel 2 adalah yang mengonsumsi daya tertinggi; untuk suhu terendah dimiliki sampel 2, diikuti sampel 3, dan sampel 1 dengan suhu tertinggi; untuk waktu respons jaringan tercepat dimiliki sampel 1, diikuti sampel 3, dan sampel 2 yang memiliki waktu respons jaringan terlambat. ***** This study aims to analyze the performance differences among three popular smart breaker samples in the Indonesian market, focusing on three primary technical parameters: power consumption, temperature, and network response time. The research is motivated by the rising trend of smart homes in Indonesia, which has been accompanied by consumer confusion in selecting reliable products amidst a market where purchasing decisions are often not based on objective performance data. A quantitative experimental method was employed, wherein three smart breaker samples were tested under 5, 7, and 9-Watt LED lamp loads to measure their power consumption, operational temperature, and network response time. The results reveal a clear performance trade-off among the brands. Sample 1 exhibited the lowest power consumption (~0.23 W), operated at the highest temperature (~36°C) with a thermal settling time of approximately ±225 seconds, and delivered the fastest network response (103-110 ms) with a maximum range of 8 meters through a brick wall. Sample 2 showed the highest power consumption (~0.55 W) but operated at the coolest temperature (~30°C) with the fastest thermal settling time (±70 seconds), while its network response was the slowest (311-331 ms) with the shortest range of 4 meters through a brick wall. Sample 3 demonstrated a balanced performance with moderate power consumption (~0.33 W), a moderate operating temperature (~34°C) with a thermal settling time of ±200 seconds, and a reliable network response (177-189 ms) with a range of 7 meters through a brick wall.In conclusion, no single brand excels across all parameters. The ideal smart breaker choice is contingent upon user priorities. Sample 1 is superior for low power consumption, followed by Sample 3, with Sample 2 being the least efficient. For thermal safety, Sample 2 performs best with the lowest temperature, followed by Sample 3, while Sample 1 operates at the highest temperature. For network responsiveness, Sample 1 is the fastest, followed by Sample 3, with Sample 2 being the slowest.

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1). Mochammad Djaohar, S.T., M.Sc. ; 2). Dr. Aris Sunawar, S.Pd., M.T.
Subjects:	Teknologi dan Ilmu Terapan > Teknik Energi > Energi Listrik
Divisions:	FT > S1 Pendidikan Teknik Elektro
Depositing User:	Users 28429 not found.
Date Deposited:	05 Aug 2025 02:10
Last Modified:	05 Aug 2025 02:10
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/57685

Actions (login required)

View Item