PERBANDINGAN METODE LATIHAN DRILL RECEIVE SERVIS DAN DIG DEFEND TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENINGKATAN PASSING BAWAH ATLET BOLAVOLI KLUB VIKING BAJARATA

RAAFI ADI BACHTIAR, . (2025) PERBANDINGAN METODE LATIHAN DRILL RECEIVE SERVIS DAN DIG DEFEND TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENINGKATAN PASSING BAWAH ATLET BOLAVOLI KLUB VIKING BAJARATA. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (893kB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Download (94kB)
	Text BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (730kB)
	Text BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (340kB)
	Text BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (351kB)
	Text BAB V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (46kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (165kB)
	Text DAFTAR LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, 1) kemampuan passing bawah dengan latihan Drill receive servis. 2) kemampuan passing bawah dengan latihan Drill dig defend. 3) efektivitas kemampuan passing bawah antara perlakuan latihan Drill receive servis dan Drill dig defend. Penelitian menggunakan metode pendekatan kuantitatif komparatif, yaitu membandingkan kedua metode latihan yang berbeda. Teknik pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara purposive sampling. Setelah didapat 20 atlet yang memenuhi kriteria, maka dilakukan tes awal menggunakan instrumen tes Wall Passing. Sampel dibagi menjadi dua kelompok perlakuan dengan metode split half berdasarkan nomor urut ganjil dan genap serta mempertimbangkan pemerataan kemampuan awal. Setiap kelompok menjalani 16 kali pertemuan latihan selama empat minggu dengan frekuensi empat kali dalam seminggu. Kelompok pertama menjalani latihan drill receive servis, sementara kelompok kedua melakukan latihan drill dig defend. Setelah proses latihan selesai, dilakukan tes akhir. Hasil tes akhir kemudian diuji menggunakan uji-t dengan taraf signifikansi 0,10. Hasil uji-t pada kelompok drill receive servis menunjukkan nilai thitung= 6,437 > ttabel = 1,833, sedangkan pada kelompok drill dig defend diperoleh thitung = 4,090 > ttabel = 1,833. Artinya, kedua metode memberikan peningkatan yang signifikan. Perbandingan antar metode juga menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan dengan nilai thitung = 2,014 > ttabel = 1,330. Rata-rata peningkatan passing bawah pada kelompok drill receive servis sebesar 91,40, sedangkan pada kelompok drill dig defend sebesar 71,60. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa metode drill receive servis lebih efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan passing bawah dibandingkan drill dig defend. ***** This study aims to determine, 1) the ability of underhand passing with Drill receive serve training. 2) the ability of underhand passing with Drill dig defend training. 3) the effectiveness of underhand passing ability between Drill receive serve training and Drill dig defend training. The study used a comparative quantitative approach method, namely comparing two different training methods. The sampling technique was carried out by purposive sampling. After obtaining 20 athletes who met the criteria, an initial test was conducted using the Wall Passing test instrument. The sample was divided into two treatment groups using the split half method based on odd and even serial numbers and considering the even distribution of initial abilities. Each group underwent 16 training meetings over four weeks with a frequency of four times a week. The first group underwent drill receive serve training, while the second group did drill dig defend training. After the training process was completed, a final test was conducted. The results of the final test were then tested using a t-test with a significance level of 0.10. The t-test results in the receive serve drill group showed a value of 6.437 > 1.833, while in the dig defend drill group, 4.090 > 1.833. This means that both methods provide significant improvements. The comparison between the methods also showed a significant difference with a value of 2.014 > 1.330. The average increase in underhand passing in the receive-serve drill group was 91.40, while in the dig-defend drill group it was 71.60. Therefore, it can be concluded that the receive-serve drill method is more effective in improving underhand passing ability than the dig-defend drill.

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1). Dr. Tirto Apriyanto, S.Pd, M.Si. ; 2). Drs. Bambang Sutiyono, M.Pd.
Subjects:	Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga > Kepelatihan,Manajemen Kepelatihan
Divisions:	FIO > Kepelatihan Kecabangan Olahraga
Depositing User:	Users 28979 not found.
Date Deposited:	05 Aug 2025 07:18
Last Modified:	05 Aug 2025 07:18
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/57786

Actions (login required)

View Item