KAILA SYAFIRA PUTRI, . (2026) PERAN STRATEGIS D.I. PANDJAITAN DALAM PERTAHANAN NEGARA DAN DINAMIKA POLITIK MENJELANG PERISTIWA G30S (1952-1965). Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.
![[img]](http://repository.unj.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
COVER.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
BAB I (1).pdf Download (448kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (498kB) |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (628kB) |
|
Text
BAB IV KESIMPULAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (358kB) |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (395kB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN & RIWAYAT HIDUP.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Penelitian ini membahas peran strategis D.I. Pandjaitan dalam pertahanan negara dan dinamika politik Indonesia pada periode 1952–1965. Pemilihan topik ini didasarkan pada kecenderungan penulisan sejarah yang lebih banyak menempatkan D.I. Pandjaitan sebagai korban Peristiwa Gerakan 30 September (G30S), sedangkan kiprah dan kontribusinya sebelum tahun 1965 belum banyak dikaji secara khusus. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran D.I. Pandjaitan dalam merespons pergolakan pasca-Peristiwa 17 Oktober 1952, mendukung kesiapan pertahanan negara, serta menghadapi dinamika politik internal Angkatan Darat pada masa Demokrasi Terpimpin. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode sejarah dengan penyajian deskriptif-naratif yang meliputi tahap pemilihan topik, heuristik, verifikasi, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Sumber penelitian terdiri atas arsip militer, surat kabar sezaman, dokumen pemerintah, buku biografi, jurnal ilmiah, dan literatur sejarah yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketika menjabat sebagai Wakil Kepala Staf sekaligus Pelaksana Kepala Staf TT II/Sriwijaya, D.I. Pandjaitan berperan menjaga keberlangsungan rantai komando, menata sistem kerja staf, serta memperkuat disiplin dan solidaritas kesatuan setelah Peristiwa 17 Oktober 1952. Penugasannya sebagai Atase Militer di Jerman Barat turut mendukung hubungan militer, kerja sama teknis, pengembangan industri pertahanan, dan perjuangan pembebasan Irian Barat. Selanjutnya, sebagai Asisten IV/Logistik Menteri/Panglima Angkatan Darat, ia menata distribusi perbekalan dan sarana angkutan, mendorong pemeliharaan material, mendukung pengembangan Pindad, serta memperkuat kesiapan logistik dalam pelaksanaan Trikora dan Dwikora. Dalam dinamika politik menjelang G30S, Pandjaitan lebih menonjol sebagai perwira profesional yang menjaga loyalitas terhadap institusi daripada sebagai pelaku manuver politik secara terbuka. Dengan demikian, D.I. Pandjaitan tidak hanya memiliki arti sebagai Pahlawan Revolusi, tetapi juga sebagai perwira yang memberikan kontribusi nyata terhadap konsolidasi organisasi dan kesiapan pertahanan Angkatan Darat. ***** This study examines the strategic role of D.I. Pandjaitan in national defense and Indonesia’s political dynamics from 1952 to 1965. This topic was selected because historical writings have generally portrayed D.I. Pandjaitan primarily as a victim of the September 30 Movement, while his career and contributions before 1965 have received limited scholarly attention. This study aims to analyze Pandjaitan’s role in responding to the aftermath of the October 17, 1952 Incident, supporting national defense readiness, and dealing with the internal political dynamics of the Indonesian Army during the Guided Democracy period. This study applies the historical method with a descriptive-narrative approach, consisting of topic selection, heuristics, verification, interpretation, and historiography. The sources include military archives, contemporary newspapers, government documents, biographies, scholarly journals, and relevant historical literature. The findings show that, while serving as Deputy Chief of Staff and Acting Chief of Staff of TT II/Sriwijaya, Pandjaitan helped maintain the chain of command, reorganize staff operations, and strengthen discipline and unit solidarity following the October 17, 1952 Incident. His assignment as Military Attaché in West Germany also supported military relations, technical cooperation, the development of Indonesia’s defense industry, and the campaign for the liberation of West Irian. Later, as Assistant IV for Logistics to the Minister/Commander of the Army, he organized the distribution of supplies and transportation facilities, promoted material maintenance, supported the development of Pindad, and strengthened logistical readiness for Trikora and Dwikora. Amid the political tensions preceding the September 30 Movement, Pandjaitan appeared more prominently as a professional officer who maintained institutional loyalty than as an actor engaged in open political maneuvering. Therefore, D.I. Pandjaitan should be understood not only as a Hero of the Revolution, but also as an officer who made a significant contribution to the organizational consolidation and defense readiness of the Indonesian Army.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | 1). Sri Martini, S.S., M.Hum. ; 2). Firdaus Hadi Santosa, M.Pd. |
| Subjects: | Ilmu Sejarah > Biografi |
| Divisions: | FIS > S1 Pendidikan Sejarah |
| Depositing User: | Kaila Syafira Putri . |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Jul 2026 05:24 |
| Last Modified: | 29 Jul 2026 05:24 |
| URI: | http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/67652 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
