AFRI TANTRI, . (2021) PENGARUH GAYA MENGAJAR DAN KOORDINASI MATA TANGAN KAKI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GROUNDSTROKES TENIS LAPANGAN (Studi Eksperimen di PJKR FIK UNIMED 2017). Doktor thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (502kB) |
|
Text
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (848kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (140kB) | Request a copy |
|
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (389kB) |
|
Text
COVER.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat pengaruh gaya mengajar terhadap hasil belajar pukulan groundstrokes tenis lapangan bagi kelompok mahasiswa yang memiliki koordinasi mata tangan dan kaki tinggi dan rendah. Metode yang digunakan adalah eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 3. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Program Studi PJKR FIK Unieversitas Negeri Medan dengan sampel mahasiswa semester V. Hasil penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Terdapat perbedaan nyata proses pukulan grounstroke dalam tenis lapangan, antara kelompok mahasiswa yang diberi perlakuan gaya mengajar resiprokal dengan kelompok mahasiswa yang diberi perlakuan gaya mengajar latihan. (2) Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan proses pukulan grounstroke dalam tenis lapangan, antara kelompok mahasiswa yang diberi perlakuan gaya mengajar resiprokal dengan kelompok mahasiswa yang diberi perlakuan gaya mengajar inklusi. (3) Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan proses pukulan grounstroke dalam tenis lapangan, antara kelompok mahasiswa yang diberi perlakuan gaya mengajar latihan dengan kelompok mahasiswa yang diberi perlakuan gaya mengajar inklusi. (4) Terdapat interaksi antara gaya mengajar dan koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan pukulan groundstrokes tenis lapangan. (5) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar keterampilan groundstrokes yang menggunakan gaya mengajar resiprokal dengan gaya mengajar latihan yang memiliki koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki tinggi. (6) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar keterampilan groundstrokes yang menggunakan gaya mengajar resiprokal dengan gaya mengajar inklusi yang memiliki koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki tinggi. (7) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar keterampilan groundstrokes antara yang menggunakan gaya mengajar latihan dengan gaya mengajar inklusi yang memiliki koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki tinggi. (8) Tidak terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar keterampilan groundstrokes yang menggunakan gaya mengajar resiprokal dengan gaya mengajar latihan yang memiliki koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki rendah. (9) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar keterampilan groundstrokes yang menggunakan gaya mengajar resiprokal dengan gaya mengajar inklusi yang memiliki koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki. (10) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar keterampilan groundstrokes antara yang menggunakan gaya mengajar latihan dengan gaya mengajar inklusi yang memiliki koordinasi mata, tangan dan kaki rendah. Dari hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa gaya mengajar latihan dengan koordinasi mata tangan kaki tinggi secara keseluruhan lebih baik untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar pukulan groundstrokes tenis lapangan, dibandingkan gaya mengajar resiprokal dan gaya mengajar inklusi. The purpose of this study is to find out the effect of teaching style on learning outcomes of tennis groundstrokes for groups of students who have high and low eye and foot coordination. The method used was an experiment with a 2 x 3 factorial design. This research was carried out in the Physical and Health Education Study Program, Faculty of Sports Sciences, State University of Medan with semester V students as the samples. The results of this study concluded that: (1) There was a real difference in the process of grounstroke in tennis, between groups of students who were treated with reciprocal teaching style and groups of students who were treated with training-style teaching. (2) There is a significant difference in the process of grounstroke in tennis, between groups of students who are treated with reciprocal teaching styles and groups of students who are treated with inclusive teaching style. (3) There is a significant difference in the process of grounstroke in tennis, between groups of students who are treated with the teaching style of training exercises and groups of students who are treated with an inclusive teaching style. (4) There is an interaction between the teaching style and the coordination of the eyes, hands and feet to the results of learning the skills of groundstrokes in tennis. (5) There are differences in the learning outcome of groundstrokes skills that use reciprocal teaching style with training teaching style exercises that have high eye, hand and foot coordination. (6) There are differences in the learning outcome of groundstrokes skills that use reciprocal teaching style with inclusive teaching style that has high eye, hand, and foot coordination. (7) There is a difference in the learning outcome of groundstrokes between those who use training teaching style and inclusive teaching style that has high eye, hand and foot coordination. (8) There is no difference in the learning outcomes of groundstrokes skills that use reciprocal teaching style with training teaching style that have low eye, hand and foot coordination. (9) There are differences in the learning outcome of groundstrokes skills that use reciprocal teaching style with inclusive teaching style that have eye, hand and foot coordination. (10) There are differences in the learning outcome of groundstrokes between those who use training teaching style with inclusive teaching style that has low eye, hand and foot coordination. It can be concluded that the training teaching style with the coordination of high eye-hand-foot coordination is overall better for improving the learning outcomes of groundstrokes in tennis, compared to reciprocal teaching styles and inclusive teaching styles.
Item Type: | Thesis (Doktor) |
---|---|
Additional Information: | 1). Prof. Dr. Moch. Asmawi, M. Pd ; 2). Dr. Johansyah Lubis, M. Pd. |
Subjects: | Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga |
Divisions: | PASCASARJANA > S3 Pendidikan Olahraga |
Depositing User: | Users 9883 not found. |
Date Deposited: | 12 Mar 2021 06:21 |
Last Modified: | 15 Mar 2021 03:16 |
URI: | http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/14273 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |