KINERJA PENELITI BERDASARKAN HASIL PENILAIAN ANGKA KREDIT PADA BADAN PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN (STUDI KASUS)

M. BASHORI IMRON, . (2020) KINERJA PENELITI BERDASARKAN HASIL PENILAIAN ANGKA KREDIT PADA BADAN PENELITIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN (STUDI KASUS). Doktor thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

[img] Text
2. BAB I.pdf

Download (712kB)
[img] Text
3. BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (975kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
4. BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (677kB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
5. BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
6. BAB V.pdf

Download (413kB)
[img] Text
7. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf

Download (551kB)
[img] Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img] Text
COVER.pdf

Download (631kB)

Abstract

Kinerja Peneliti Berdasarkan Hasil Penilaian Angka Kredit pada Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Studi Kasus) adalah penelitian kualitatif. Tujuan penelitian adalah menjelaskan (eksplanatori) proses interaksi antara faktor-faktor penyebab dengan kondisi kinerja peneliti berdasarkan hasil penilaian angka kredit. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi terlibat, wawancara, dan penelusuran dokumen dengan informan dari peneliti, Tim penilai peneliti instansi, pejabat struktural dan pejabat instansi pembina jabatan peneliti. Teknik analisis menggunakan model analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Kompetensi Peneliti dalam menghasilkan angka kredit masih mengandalkan penelitian Daftar Isian Pelaksanaan Anggaran (DIPA) karena dilakukan oleh Tim dan peneliti kurang kreatif mengembangkan menjadi artikel untuk jurnal, (2) proses penilaian angka kredit peneliti dilakukan melalui tiga jenjang yang memakan waktu cukup lama, (3) Status Akreditasi Tim Penilai Peneliti Instansi (TP2I) tetap dipertahankan agar dapat menilai dan menetapkan sendiri penetapan angka kredit peneliti, dan (4) penetapan angka kredit peneliti diperoleh dari tiga jalur yaitu pengangkatan pertama kali, permindahan antar jabatan, kenaikan jabatan peneliti, serta pengangkatan kembali karena dibebaskan. Rekomendasi penelitian ditujukan kepada Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan agar (1) melakukan pelatihan dan pendampingan membedah hasil penelitian ke dalam bentuk artikel yang siap dipublikasikan, (2) membentuk Tim Penilai Peneliti Unit Kerja (TP2U) disetiap unit kerja, (3) secara periodik perlu melakukan diskusi terfokus dengan Tim Penilai Peneliti Pusat (TP3) untuk penyamaan persepsi atas hasil penilaian angka kredit, serta (4) membuat peraturan tentang jenis kepakaran dalam bidang pendidikan dan kebudayaan, sampai digit tertentu.***********Researcher Performance Based on the Results of Credit Score Assessment at the Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Education and Culture (Case Study) is a qualitative research. The research objective is to explain (explanatory) the interaction process between the causative factors and the condition of the researcher's performance based on the results of the credit score assessment. Data collection techniques used involved observation, interviews, and document tracing with informants from researchers, agency research assessment team, structural officials and officials of the supervisory agency for research positions. The analysis technique uses an interactive analysis model. The results showed that: (1) Researchers' competence in producing credit scores still relied on research on the Budget Implementation List (BIL) because it was carried out by the team and researchers were less creative in developing articles for journals, (2) the process of assessing the researcher's credit score was carried out through three levels which takes a long time, (3) the accreditation status of the Agency Research Assessment Team (ARAT) is maintained in order to assess and determine the determination of the researcher credit score by themselves, and (4) the determination of the researcher credit score is obtained from three channels, namely first time appointment, transfer position, promotion of researcher position, and reappointment due to release. Research recommendations are addressed to the Research and Development Agency, Ministry of Education and Culture so that (1) conduct training and assistance in dissecting research results into articles that are ready to be published, (2) forming a Work Unit Research Assessment Team (WURAT) in each work unit, (3) ) periodically, it is necessary to conduct focused discussions with the Central Research Assessment Team (CRAT) to unify perceptions of the results of the credit score assessment, and (4) to make regulations on the types of expertise in education and culture, up to a certain digit.

Item Type: Thesis (Doktor)
Additional Information: 1). Prof. Dr. H. Ma'ruf Akbar, M.Pd ; 2). Prof. Dr. H. Mukhneri Mukhtar, M.Pd
Subjects: Pendidikan > Pendidikan
Pendidikan > Teori, Penelitian Pendidikan
Divisions: PASCASARJANA > S3 Manajemen Pendidikan
Depositing User: Users 10390 not found.
Date Deposited: 06 May 2021 03:48
Last Modified: 06 May 2021 03:48
URI: http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/16126

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item