BENTUK TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI DALAM PRAKTIK BERNEGOSIASI PADA SISWA KELAS X SMAN 105 JAKARTA (KAJIAN PRAGMATIK)

ALVIA SALSABILA, . (2021) BENTUK TINDAK TUTUR ILOKUSI DALAM PRAKTIK BERNEGOSIASI PADA SISWA KELAS X SMAN 105 JAKARTA (KAJIAN PRAGMATIK). Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (562kB) | Request a copy
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (670kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (31MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan tentang pemerolehan bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi dalam praktik bernegosiasi pada siswa kelas X SMAN 105 Jakarta. Pengambilan data pada penelitian ini dilakukan pada bulan Januari 2021 melalui platform zoom meeting. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian ini difokuskan pada penggunaan tindak tutur ilokusi dalam praktik bernegosiasi pada siswa kelas X SMAN 105 yang terdiri dari tindak tutur ilokusi representatif, direktif, komisif, ekspresif, dan deklaratif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dari praktik bernegosiasi siswa, ditemukan 40 percakapan siswa yang memiliki 572 pasangan tuturan dan 608 tuturan verbal. Ditemukan hasil analisis dari kelima bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi sebagai berikut : tindak tutur ilokusi representatif dengan fungsi memberitahukan sesuatu sebanyak 108 pasangan tuturan (20%), fungsi menolak sesuatu sebanyak 45 pasangan tuturan (8%), dan fungsi menjelaskan sesuatu sebanyak 64 pasangan tuturan (12%); tindak tutur ilokusi direktif dengan fungsi permintaan sebanyak 76 pasangan tuturan (14%), fungsi menyarankan sebanyak 22 pasangan tuturan (4%), dan fungsi bertanya sebanyak 130 pasangan tuturan (24%) ; tindak tutur ilokusi komisif dengan fungsi perjanjian sebanyak 19 pasangan tuturan (3%) dan fungsi penawaran sebanyak 25 pasangan tuturan (4%); tindak tutur ilokusi ekspresif dengan fungsi berterima kasih sebanyak 35 pasangan tuturan (6%) dan fungsi minta maaf sebanyak 5 pasangan tuturan (0,9%); serta tindak tutur ilokusi deklaratif dengan fungsi menjatuhkan hukuman sebanyak 4 pasangan tuturan (0,75%). This study aims to describe the acquisition of illocutionary speech acts in the practice of negotiating in class X SMAN 105 Jakarta. Data collection in this study was carried out in January 2021 through the zoom meeting platform. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method. This study focused on the use of illocutionary speech acts in negotiating practice in class X SMAN 105 which consisted of representative, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative illocutionary speech acts. Based on the results of research from students' negotiating practices, it was found that 40 students' conversations had 572 speech pairs and 608 verbal utterances. The results of the analysis of the five forms of illocutionary speech acts are as follows: representative illocutionary speech acts with the function of telling something as many as 108 pairs of speech (20%), the function of rejecting something as many as 45 pairs of speech (8%), and the function of explaining something as much as 64 speech pairs (12%); directive illocutionary speech acts with a request function of 76 speech pairs (14%), suggesting functions of 22 speech pairs (4%), and a questioning function of 130 speech pairs (24%); commissive illocutionary speech acts with an agreement function as many as 19 speech pairs (3%) and a supply function as many as 25 speech pairs (4%); expressive illocutionary speech acts with the function of thanking as many as 35 pairs of speech (6%) and the function of apologizing as many as 5 pairs of speech (0.9%); and declarative illocutionary speech acts with the function of punishing 4 pairs of utterances (0.75%).

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1). Drs. Sam Mukhtar Chaniago, M.Si. ; 2). Dr. Fathiaty Murtadho, M.Pd.
Subjects:	Bahasa dan Kesusastraan > Bahasa Indonesia
Divisions:	FBS > S1 Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
Depositing User:	Users 12292 not found.
Date Deposited:	06 Sep 2021 05:34
Last Modified:	06 Sep 2021 05:34
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/19230

Actions (login required)

View Item