PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES SUMATIF PADA COURSE "PELATIHAN PENGENALAN PENGELOLAAN PERPUSTAKAAN" DI PANDAWA PERPUSTAKAAN NASIONAL RI

Muhammad Qioravansyah Drysa Tuela, . (2026) PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES SUMATIF PADA COURSE "PELATIHAN PENGENALAN PENGELOLAAN PERPUSTAKAAN" DI PANDAWA PERPUSTAKAAN NASIONAL RI. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text Skripsi_File Cover_M. Qioravansyah D. T-compressed.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text Skripsi_File Bab 1_M. Qioravansyah D. T.pdf Download (239kB)
	Text Skripsi_File Bab 2_M. Qioravansyah D. T.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (572kB) | Request a copy
	Text Skripsi_File Bab 3_M. Qioravansyah D. T.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (416kB) | Request a copy
	Text Skripsi_File Bab 4_M. Qioravansyah D. T.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (661kB) | Request a copy
	Text Skripsi_File Bab 5_M. Qioravansyah D. T.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (200kB) | Request a copy
	Text Skripsi_File Daftar Pustaka_M. Qioravansyah D. T.pdf Download (201kB)
	Text Skripsi_File Lampiran_M. Qioravansyah D. T_compressed.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan instrumen tes sumatif pada course “Pelatihan Pengenalan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan” di Perpustakaan Nasional RI. Ketiadaan alat ukur yang objektif seperti tes sumatif dalam mengevaluasi hasil belajar peserta course menjadi latar belakang dilakukannya penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan prosedur pengembangan hasil sintesa dari prosedur pengembangan menurut Prof. Dr. Djaali dan Dr. Pudji Muljono, Suharsimi Arikunto, dan Sumadi Suryabrata dengan hasil tahapan yaitu, (1) Menetapkan Tujuan Tes, (2) Analisis Kurikulum, (3) Analisis Modul dan Materi, (4) Penulisan Tujuan Instruksional Khusus, (5) Membuat Kisi-kisi, (6) Penulisan Soal, (7) Menelaah Soal dengan Validitas Isi atau Konten, (8) Melakukan Uji Coba, (9) Melakukan Analisis Hasil Uji Coba, (10) Revisi dan Finalisasi Tes. Hasil pengembangan ini telah melalui uji coba dengan 78 peserta dan uji validitas isi oleh ahli materi dan ahli evaluasi dengan hasil presentase keduanya 93% dan 95,5%. Kemudian hasil uji empiris melalui uji validitas, uji reliabilitas, uji tingkat kesukaran, dan uji daya beda. Pada uji validitas seluruh soal sebanyak 35 butir dinyatakan. Lalu hasil uji realibilitas mendapatkan nilai sebesar 0,867 (tinggi) menunjukkan soal yang konsisten. Hasil Uji tingkat kesukaran diketahuhi 31 soal dinyatakan mudah dan 4 soal dinyatakan sedang, hal tersebut sesuai dengan bobot soal yang menggunakan kognitif level 2. Sementara hasil uji daya beda didapatkan 26 soal perlu perbaikan dan 9 soal diterima. Uji efektivitas distractor didapatkan bahwa 32 diterima, 91 direvisi, dan 17 ditolak. Dengan demikian,setelah dilakukan perbaikan, instrumen tes ini dapat dinyatakan valid dan layak digunakan sebagai alat untuk mengukur penguasaan dan pemahaman materi peserta. **** This study aimed to develop a summative test instrument for the Pelatihan Pengenalan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan course at the National Library of the Republic of Indonesia. The study was motivated by the absence of an objective summative assessment to comprehensively measure participants’ learning outcomes upon completing the course. A Research and Development approach was employed using a synthesized development procedure adapted from Djaali and Pudji Muljono, Suharsimi Arikunto, and Sumadi Suryabrata. The development process consisted of ten stages: determining the test objectives, conducting curriculum analysis, analyzing modules and learning materials, formulating instructional objectives, developing the test blueprint, writing test items, conducting content validation, pilot testing, analyzing the pilot test results, and revising and finalizing the instrument. The developed instrument was validated by a subject matter expert and an educational evaluation expert using a five�point rating scale accompanied by an assessment rubric. The content validity results showed scores of 93% and 95.5%, respectively, indicating that the instrument was highly valid. The instrument was subsequently piloted with 78 course participants. Empirical testing included item validity, reliability, item difficulty, discrimination index, and distractor effectiveness analyses. All 35 test items were declared valid, while the reliability coefficient of 0.867 indicated high internal consistency. Item difficulty analysis classified 31 items as easy and 4 items as moderate, reflecting the predominance of Level 2 cognitive objectives in the course. The discrimination analysis indicated that 9 items were accepted and 26 required revision. Furthermore, the distractor effectiveness analysis showed that 32 distractors were accepted, 91 required revision, and 17 were rejected. Based on the content validation and empirical testing results, the developed summative test instrument was considered valid and suitable for measuring participants’ mastery and understanding of the course content.

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1). Dr. Khaerudin, M.Pd.; 2). Drs. R.A. Hirmana Wargahadibrata, M.Sc.Ed.
Subjects:	Pendidikan > Evaluasi Pendidikan Pendidikan > Teori, Penelitian Pendidikan Teknologi dan Ilmu Terapan > Teknologi (umum) > Teknologi Pendidikan
Divisions:	FIP > S1 Teknologi Pendidikan
Depositing User:	Muhammad Qioravansyah Drysa Tuela .
Date Deposited:	10 Aug 2026 06:16
Last Modified:	10 Aug 2026 06:16
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/69633

Actions (login required)

View Item