EVALUASI PROGRAM PRESTASI TNI ANGKATAN LAUT DALAM EVENT PIALA PANGLIMA TNI TAHUN 2019

MOHAMMAD FATHAN MUBINA, . (2023) EVALUASI PROGRAM PRESTASI TNI ANGKATAN LAUT DALAM EVENT PIALA PANGLIMA TNI TAHUN 2019. Magister thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text 1. COVER.pdf Download (723kB)
	Text 2. BAB 1.pdf Download (149kB)
	Text 3. BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (757kB) | Request a copy
	Text 4. BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (511kB) | Request a copy
	Text 5. BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (594kB) | Request a copy
	Text 6. BAB 5.pdf Download (119kB)
	Text 7. DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (355kB)
	Text 8. LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana skor pada penilaian evaluasi pada masing masing komponen yaitu Context (Acuan dan Tujuan, Input (Sistem Perekrutan, Pembiayaan, Sarana dan Prasarana dan Aturan), Process (Peran, dan Pelaksanaan), dan Product (Hasil). Penelitian ini dilakukan bulan September 2021 sampai dengan Januari 2023 di Jakarta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode evaluatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif, dilakukan berdasarkan hasil interaksi dengan subjek di lapangan melalui metode observasi, wawancara, kuesioner dan penelitian dokumen terkait berdasarkan kriteria evaluasi. Penelitian ini dilakukan melalui kegiatan pengumpulan data yaitu dokumentasi, kuesioner, observasi dan wawancara. Dari hasil penilaian dari kuisioner tersebut maka nilai total yang didapat dari menjumlahkan penilaian butir soal yang dikonversi menjadi nilai 100 dihitung. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa evaluasi context disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Cukup, evaluasi input disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Baik, evaluasi sistem perekrutan disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Sangat Baik, evaluasi sarana dan prasaran disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Kurang, evaluasi sistem perekrutan disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Sangat Baik, evaluasi aturan disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Sangat Baik, evaluasi process disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Cukup, evaluasi sistem perekrutan disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Baik, evaluasi peran disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Cukup, evaluasi context disimpulkan masuk dalam kategori Baik. Sedangkan dari hasil keseluruhan evaluasi masuk dalam kategori Baik secara keseluruhan pada penilaian evaluasi. ***** This study aims to find out how the score on the evaluation assessment for each component, namely Context (Reference and Objectives, Input (Recruitment System, Funding, Facilities and Infrastructure and Rules), Process (Roles and Implementation), and Product (Results). This research was carried out from September 2021 to January 2023 in Jakarta.The research method used is an evaluative method with a qualitative and quantitative approach, carried out based on the results of interactions with subjects in the field through observation, interviews, questionnaires and related document research based on evaluation criteria. carried out through data collection activities, namely documentation, questionnaires, observations and interviews.From the results of the assessment of the questionnaire, the total value obtained from adding up the assessment of the item items converted to a value of 100 is calculated.The results show that the context evaluation is concluded to be included in the Enough category, evaluate i input concluded in the Good category, evaluation of the recruitment system concluded in the Very Good category, evaluation of facilities and infrastructure concluded in the Poor category, evaluation of the recruitment system concluded in the Very Good category, evaluation of rules concluded in the Very Good category, process evaluation concluded included in the Enough category, the evaluation of the recruitment system was concluded to be in the Good category, the role evaluation was concluded to be in the Enough category, the context evaluation was concluded to be included in the Good category. Meanwhile, the results of the overall evaluation are included in the overall Good category in the evaluation assessment.

Item Type:	Thesis (Magister)
Additional Information:	1). Prof. Dr. Moch. Asmawi, M.Pd. ; 2). Dr. Heni Widyaningsih. S.E., M.E.
Subjects:	Olah Raga dan Seni Pertunjukan > Pendidikan Olah Raga
Divisions:	PASCASARJANA > S2 Pendidikan Jasmani
Depositing User:	Users 17936 not found.
Date Deposited:	18 Apr 2023 01:00
Last Modified:	18 Apr 2023 01:00
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/38360

Actions (login required)

View Item