INTERACTIVE PATTERNS OF THE OPENING STATEMENT IN THE DEFAMATION CASE TRIAL OF DEPP VS HEARD 2022

ADELIA IKAWATI, . (2023) INTERACTIVE PATTERNS OF THE OPENING STATEMENT IN THE DEFAMATION CASE TRIAL OF DEPP VS HEARD 2022. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (781kB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (297kB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (395kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (215kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (630kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (209kB) | Request a copy
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (211kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (449kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Mengingat aspek interaktif dari pidato monolog, penelitian ini bermaksud untuk menganalisis pernyataan pembukaan oleh pengacara penggugat, Ben Chew, dalam persidangan kasus pencemaran nama baik Depp lawan Heard pada tahun 2022. Menggunakan teori tindak ilokusi Searle (1979) dan model stance dan engagement Hyland (2005) yang dimodifikasi oleh Chaemsaithong (2014), serta metode deskriptif kualitatif, penulis dapat menguraikan bagaimana pola-pola interaktif dapat dilihat melalui ucapan-ucapan yang disajikan oleh pengacara. Hasil temuan menunjukkan 68 ujaran didominasi oleh 46% tindak ilokusi representatif dan 40% tindak ilukosi komisif, sedangkan penemuan terkecil sebesar 7% ilokusi ekspresif dan 7% ilokusi direktif. Kemudian, ditemukan juga 91 penanda stance yang meliputi 50% penanda sikap dan 13% kata ganti orang pertama, serta 54 penanda engagement yang meliputi 26% kata ganti orang kedua, 10% reported discourse, dan 1% pertanyaan. Temuan tersebut mempengaruhi pola interaktif karena tindak ilokusi mengungkapkan tindakan yang dimaksudkan oleh pengacara ketika ia mengkomunikasikan ucapannya, penanda stance mengungkapkan dengan cara apa ia mengkomunikasikan proposisinya tentang kasus tersebut, sedangkan penanda engagement mengungkapkan dengan cara apa pengacara melibatkan juri sebagai lawan bicaranya dan bagaimana dia melibatkan beberapa suara eksternal untuk mendukung pidatonya. Melalui perangkat interaktif tersebut, pengacara menegosiasikan representasinya dalam pernyataan pembukaan pada tiga tingkat: naratif, interpersonal, dan diri pribadi. Negosiasi tersebut dioperasikan secara bersamaan sebagai sarana interaktif untuk mempresentasikan proposisi dan identitasnya sebagai pengacara sambil menjalin kesesuaian dengan juri. Oleh karena itu, membujuk mereka untuk sependapat dengan sudut pandang pengacara yang memihak penggugat di persidangan. ***** In light of the interactive aspects of a monologue speech, this study intends to examine the opening statement by the plaintiff’s lawyer, Ben Chew, in the trial of the Depp versus Heard Defamation case in 2022. Utilising Searle’s Illocutionary Acts (1979) and Hyland’s Stance and Engagement Model (2005), which Chaemsaithong (2014) modified, and the qualitative descriptive method, the writer can elaborate on how the interactive patterns can be discerned through the utterances presented by the lawyer. The finding shows 68 utterances dominated by 46% representative acts and 40% commissive acts, while the least occurrences are 7% of expressive acts and 7% of directive acts. Thereafter, it is also found 91 stance markers in the form of 50% attitude markers and 13% first-person pronouns, and 54 engagement markers in the form of 26% second-person pronouns, 10% reported discourse, and 1% questions. Those findings affect the interactive patterns because the Illocutionary acts reveal the intended acts of the lawyer when he was communicating his utterance, the stance markers reveal in what way he communicated his proposition about the case, while the engagement markers reveal in what way the lawyer involved the jurors as his addressee and how he involved some external voices to support his speech. Through those interactive devices, the lawyer negotiated his representations within the opening statement at three levels: narrative, interpersonal, and personal self. Those negotiations are operated simultaneously as interactive means for presenting his proposition and identity as a lawyer while engaging rapport with jurors. Therefore, persuading them to be on the same page with the lawyer’s point of view, in which he stood on the plaintiff’s side in the trial.

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1). Ati Sumiati, M.Hum. ; 2). Rahayu Purbasari, M.Hum.
Subjects:	Bahasa dan Kesusastraan > Linguistik
Divisions:	FBS > S1 Sastra Inggris
Depositing User:	Users 18243 not found.
Date Deposited:	14 Sep 2023 01:15
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2023 01:15
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/42279

Actions (login required)

View Item