BONIARTA MUNTE, . (2026) PENERAPAN METODE PEER TEACHING DAN METODE RESITASI DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATA PELAJARAN PERBANKAN DASAR DI SMKN 31 JAKARTA. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.
|
Text
Cover_Boniarta Munte.pdf Download (596kB) |
|
|
Text
Bab 1_Boniarta Munte.pdf Download (318kB) |
|
|
Text
Bab 2_Boniarta Munte.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (594kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Bab 3_Boniarta Munte.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (437kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Bab 4_Boniarta Munte.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Bab 5_Boniarta Munte.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (236kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text
Daftar Pustaka_Boniarta Munte.pdf Download (240kB) |
|
|
Text
Lampiran dan Riwayat Hidup_Boniarta Munte.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah penerapan metode peer teaching dan metode resitasi mampu meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) dengan model penelitian Kemmis dan Mc. Taggart. Penelitian dilakukan dengan 2 Siklus, masing masing dengan 3 kali pertemuan. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi, pretest dan posttest serta dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data dari hasil belajar siswa dengan Uji normalitas, uji beda, rata rata nilai dan persentase kelulusan. Berdasarkan hasil uji beda Wilcoxon nilai Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) sebesar 0,001, nilai signifikansi 0,001 < 0,05, maka H₀ ditolak dan H₁ diterima. Terdapat peningkatan hasil belajar dan perbedaan hasil belajar pada siklus 1 dan siklus 2. Rata rata hasil belajar siswa pada siklus 1 adalah 73,47, terdapat peningkatan hasil belajar pada siklus 2 dengan rata rata hasil belajar siswa adalah 93,66. ***** This study aims to determine whether the application of peer teaching and recitation methods can improve student learning outcomes. This study used the Classroom Action Research (CAR) method with the Kemmis and McTaggart research model. The study was conducted in two cycles, each with three meetings.. Data collection techniques used were observation, pretests, posttests, and documentation. Data analysis techniques for student learning outcomes used normality tests, difference tests, average scores, and passing percentages. Based on the results of the Wilcoxon difference test, the Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) value was 0.001. Since the significance value of 0.001 <0.05, H₀ was rejected and H₁ was accepted. There was an improvement in learning outcomes and a difference in learning outcomes between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2. The average student learning outcome in Cycle 1 was 73.47; an improvement was observed in Cycle 2, with an average of 93.66.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Sarjana) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | 1). Santi Susanti, S.Pd., M.AK.; 2). Erika Takidah, S.E.Ak.M.Si. CA. Ph.D. |
| Subjects: | Pendidikan > Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Pendidikan > Penelitian Tindakan Kelas > Metode Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan > Pendidikan Kejuruan dan Sekolah Kejuruan |
| Divisions: | FE > S1 Pendidikan Ekonomi |
| Depositing User: | Boniarta Munte . |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2026 06:30 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Aug 2026 06:30 |
| URI: | http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/70201 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
