PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PADA MATA KULIAH DESAIN BUSANA

HISKIA HILDA TABITA PINONTOAN, . (2022) PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PADA MATA KULIAH DESAIN BUSANA. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Download (395kB)
	Text BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (975kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (403kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (621kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (261kB) | Request a copy
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (480kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian mata kuliah Desain Busana yang mampu menggambarkan kemampuan siswa pada ranah kognitif dan psikomotorik berdasarkan aspek assessment question, reliability, validity, timelines and cost, motivation dan other considerations. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode research and development (RnD) dengan model 4D yang dilakukan dengan langkah define, design, dan development. Indikator penelitian yang digunakan berdasarkan aspek assessment question, reliability, validity, timelines and cost, motivation dan other considerations. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen angket tertutup-terbuka dengan menggunakan skala pengukuran rating scale. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan, instrumen non tes laporan hasil analisis profil desainer mendapatkan skor tertinggi pada aspek timelines and cost dengan skor 92% sehingga dinyatakan sangat layak dan terendah pada aspek assessment question dan validity dengan skor 76% sehingga dinyatakan layak. Lalu pada instrumen non tes presentasi hasil analisis profil desainer mendapatkan skor tertinggi pada aspek timelines and cost dengan skor 92% sehingga dinyatakan sangat layak dan terendah pada aspek assessment question dan validity dengan skor 76% sehingga dinyatakan layak. Sedangkan untuk instrumen non tes ujian tengah semester mendapatkan skor tertinggi pada aspek reliability dengan skor 92% sehingga dinyatakan sangat layak dan terendah pada aspek validity dengan skor 78% sehingga dinyatakan layak. Lalu pada instrumen tes ujian akhir semester memiliki skor tertinggi pada aspek assessment question dan motivation dengan skor 96% sehingga dinyatakan sangat layak dan skor terendah pada aspek validity dengan skor 80% sehingga dinyatakan layak. Dan yang terakhir untuk instrumen non tes portofolio mendapatkan skor tertinggi pada aspek reliability dengan skor 92% sehingga dinyatakan sangat layak dan terendah pada aspek validity dengan skor 78% sehingga dinyatakan layak. Sehingga hasilnya pada aspek assessment question mendapatkan hasil 40% layak dan 60 % sangat layak, aspek reliability mendapatkan hasil 100 % sangat layak, aspek validity mendapatkan hasil 100 % layak, aspek timelines and cost mendapatkan hasil 100 % sangat layak, aspek motivation mendapatkan hasil 100 % sangat layak, dan aspek other considerations mendapatkan hasil 40% layak dan 60 % sangat layak. *** This research is done with purpose on developing fashion design course’s assessment instrument that can describe student’s cognitif and psychomotor ability based on six aspects, assessment question, reliability, validity, timelines and cost, motivation and other considerations. Methods that used in this research is research and development (RnD) with 4D model that is done in three steps, define, design, and development. Research indicators that used are based on six aspects, assessment question, reliability, validity, timelines and cost, motivation and other considerations. Data were collected using open-close questionnaire and using rating scale. Based on research that has been done, non test instrument for designer’s profile analysis result report get the highest score on aspect timelines and cost with score 92% so it’s declared as receivable and lowest score on aspect assessment question and validity with score 76% and declared as receivable. Then on non test instrument for designer’s profile analysis result presentation get the highest score on aspect timelines and cost with score 92% so it’s declared as receivable and lowest score on aspect assessment question and validity with score 76% and declared as receivable. Whilst non test instrument for mid term test get the highest score on aspect reliability with score 92% so it’s declared as very receivable and lowest score on aspect validity with score 78% and declared as receivable. Then on test instrument for final term test get the highest score on aspect assessment question and motivation with score 96% so it’s declared as very receivable and lowest score on aspect validity with score 80% and declared as receivable. And the last is non test instrument for portofolio that get highest score on aspect reliability with score 92% so it’s declared as very receivable and lowest score on aspect validity with score 78% and declared as receivable. The result on assessment question aspect gets 40% receivable and 60% very receivable, reliability aspect gets 100% very receivable, validity aspect gets 100% receivable, timelines and cost aspect gets 100% very receivable, motivation aspect gets 100% very receivable, and other considerations gets 40% receivable and 60% very receivable.

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1). Dra. Melly Prabawati, M.Pd. ; 2). Esty Nurbaity Arrsy, S.Pd., M.KM.
Subjects:	Desain Kostum, Tata Busana > Tata Busana
Divisions:	FT > S1 Pendidikan Tata Busana
Depositing User:	Users 15724 not found.
Date Deposited:	05 Sep 2022 05:52
Last Modified:	05 Sep 2022 05:52
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/34366

Actions (login required)

View Item