PENGARUH PRESSURE, OPPORTUNITY, DAN RATIONALIZATION TERHADAP KECURANGAN AKADEMIK MAHASISWA FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA ANGKATAN 2019

HARTONO, . (2023) PENGARUH PRESSURE, OPPORTUNITY, DAN RATIONALIZATION TERHADAP KECURANGAN AKADEMIK MAHASISWA FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA ANGKATAN 2019. Sarjana thesis, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI JAKARTA.

	Text COVER.pdf Download (2MB)
	Text BAB 1.pdf Download (886kB)
	Text BAB 2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (723kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (867kB) | Request a copy
	Text BAB 5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (133kB) | Request a copy
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (199kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pressure, opportunity, dan rationalization tergadap kecurangan akademik mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Jakarta Angkatan 2019. Penelitian ini dilakukan selama tiga bulan dimulai pada Juni 2023 hingga Agustus 2023. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode penelitian survei serta menggunakan teknik analisis regresi linear berganda. Populasi pada penelitian ini yaitu mahasiswa yang pernah melakukan kecurangan akademik. Berdasarkan pada teori Hair et al. (2014), maka jumlah sampel pada penelitian ini sebanyak 110 mahasiswa. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik Purposive Sampling. Data semua variabel merupakan data primer. Pengolahan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan program SPSS versi 26.0. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan yaitu (1) Uji Persyaratan Analisis yang terdiri dari uji normalitas dan uji linearitas. Hasil uji normalitas Kolmogorov-Smirnov diperoleh nilai signifikansi 0,087 > 0,05; Hasil uji linearitas dengan nilai Deviation from Linearity variabel pressure sebesar 0,114, variabel opportunity sebesar 0,062, variabel rationalization sebesar 0,505; (2) Uji Asumsi Klasik yang terdiri dari uji multikolinearitas dan uji heteroskedastisitas. Hasil uji multikolinearitas untuk variabel pressure memiliki nilai Tolerance 0,496 > 0,1 dan VIF 1,057 < 10, variabel opportunity memiliki nilai Tolerance 0,601 > 0,1 dan VIF 1,665 < 10, variabel rationalization memiliki nilai Tolerance 0,579 > 0,1 dan VIF 1,726 < 10. Hasil uji heteroskedastisitas untuk variabel pressure sebesar 0,715 > 0,05, variabel opportunity sebesar 0,893 > 0,05, dan variabel rationalization sebesar 0,796 > 0,05; (3) Uji Regresi Linear Berganda dengan hasil persamaan Y = 0,760 + 0,168X1 + 0,233X2 + 0,413X3; (4) Uji Hipotesis yang terdiri dari uji F dan uji t. Hasil uji F pada tabel ANOVA yaitu F-hitung 34,001 > F-tabel 2,69 yang berrarti terdapat pengaruh secara bersama-sama antara Pressure (X1), Opportunity (X2), dan Rationalization (X3) terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Y). Hasil uji t untuk variabel pressure yaitu t-hitung 2,392 > t-tabel 1,98260, variabel opportunity yaitu t-hitung 2,572 > t-tabel 1,98260, variabel rationalization yaitu t-hitung 5,182 > t-tabel 1,98260. Hal tersebut berarti terdapat pengaruh positif antara masing-masing variabel yaitu pressure (X1), opportunity (X2), dan rationalization (X3) terhadap kecurangan akademik (Y); (5) Analisis koefisien determinasi dengan hasil sebesar 0,490 yang bermakna 49% variabel kecurangan akademik dapat dijelaskan oleh variabel pressure, opportunity, dan rationalization, sedangkan sisanya sebesar 51% dipengaruhi oleh variabel lain yang tidak diteliti. Kata Kunci: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, kecurangan akademik *** This study aims to determine the effect of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization on academic fraud for students of the Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Class of 2019. This research was conducted for three months starting in June 2023 to August 2023. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey research method and uses multiple linear regression analysis techniques. The population in this study were students who had committed academic fraud. Based on the theory of Hair et al. (2014), the number of samples in this study was 110 students. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique. Data for all variables are primary data. Data processing in this study used the SPSS version 26.0. The data analysis techniques used are (1) Analysis Requirements Test which consists of normality test and linearity test. The results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test obtained a significance value of 0.087 > 0.05; The results of the linearity test with the Deviation from Linearity value of the pressure variable of 0.114, the opportunity variable of 0.062, the rationalization variable of 0.505; (2) Classical Assumption Test consisting of multicollinearity test and heteroscedasticity test. The multicollinearity test results for the pressure variable have a Tolerance value of 0, 496 > 0.1 and VIF 1,057 < 10, the opportunity variable has a Tolerance value of 0.601 > 0.1 and VIF 1,665 < 10, the rationalization variable has a Tolerance value of 0.579 > 0.1 and VIF 1,726 < 10. The heteroscedasticity test results for the pressure variable are 0.715 > 0.05, the opportunity variable is 0.893 > 0.05, and the rationalization variable is 0.796 > 0.05; (3) Multiple Linear Regression Test with the results of the equation Y = 0.760 + 0.168X1 + 0.233X2 + 0.413X3; (4) Hypothesis testing which consists of the F test and t test. The results of the F test in the ANOVA table are F-count 34.001 > F-table 2.69 which means that there is a joint influence between Pressure (X1), Opportunity (X2), and Rationalization (X3) on Academic Fraud (Y). The t-test results for the pressure variable are t-count 2.392 > t-table 1.98260, the opportunity variable is t-count 2.572 > t-table 1.98260, the rationalization variable is t-count 5.182 > t-table 1.98260. This means that there is a positive effect between each variable, that is pressure (X1), opportunity (X2), and rationalization (X3) on academic fraud (Y); (5) Analysis of the coefficient of determination with a result of 0.490 which means that 49% of academic fraud variables can be explained by the variables of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization, while the remaining 51% is influenced by other variables not examined. Keywords: pressure, opportunity, rationalization, academic fraud

Item Type:	Thesis (Sarjana)
Additional Information:	1) Roni Faslah, S.Pd., M.M ; 2) Maulana Amirul Adha, S.Pd., M.Pd.
Subjects:	Pendidikan > Teori, Penelitian Pendidikan
Divisions:	FE > S1 Pendidikan Ekonomi
Depositing User:	Users 19079 not found.
Date Deposited:	31 Aug 2023 02:31
Last Modified:	31 Aug 2023 02:31
URI:	http://repository.unj.ac.id/id/eprint/40411

Actions (login required)

View Item